sony bravia (bouncy balls)
BackTV advertisment of Sony Bravia TV.
Song: Jose Gonzales - Heartbeats.
Channel: Film & Animation
Uploaded: February 24, 2006 at 1:17 pm
Author: buraknn
Length: 00:02:26
Rating: 4.88
Views: 1138550
Tags: Sony Bravia Balls advertisment ad comercial
Video Comments:
Pinky2Pooky (December 1, 2008 at 12:36 pm)
There was something on E4 about tv ads, and they said they changed their minds. :)
amateurshooter (December 1, 2008 at 3:57 am)
Again though, money wasn't the issue. It's the fact that people woulda picked that CGI crap out right away. CGI may be cheaper but it won't ever replace the experience and the work put into filming the real thing. And that goes for everything that gets put on film. As i said below, CGI is overrated and over used. I think too much CGI is just a cop out of doing the actual work.
aperakh (December 1, 2008 at 3:46 am)
not really. you create a ball shape (doesn't get easier) and project a path - standard parabolic path got G acceleration. And then you just duplicate the shape over and over.
We're not talking half hour work or anything, but cheaper renting out a street in SF, bring out the crews, and cleaning up all the balls and the damage.
CGI is almost always cheaper.
In this case because of such simple. uniform mathematical shapes and paths, you probably would not have known the difference.
We're not talking half hour work or anything, but cheaper renting out a street in SF, bring out the crews, and cleaning up all the balls and the damage.
CGI is almost always cheaper.
In this case because of such simple. uniform mathematical shapes and paths, you probably would not have known the difference.
amateurshooter (December 1, 2008 at 3:24 am)
I don't think it looks CGI. I think the video quality is just that good and clear and sharp. I really hate that everyone now days have to think in terms of CGI-ing EVERYTHING. It friggin stupid. I think CGI is overrated and totally and completely over used in a lot of things that are filmed in today's film industry. Call me old fashioned but that's what i think.
amateurshooter (December 1, 2008 at 3:20 am)
It would actually be cheaper to get all those bouncy balls. Besides money isn't even the issue. I don't know anyone that would sit in front of a computer for hours on end and CG in every single one of them bouncy balls. It would be rediculous. It would just be way shorter on time and way easier to just get 250 thousand bouncy balls and throw them down a street in san fransisco lol.
Kamikazeesouled (December 1, 2008 at 12:19 am)
watch the making of
aperakh (November 30, 2008 at 5:25 pm)
how do you know this?
because it looks like CGI to me. I know I would have used CGI.
many thousands dollars cheaper and probably indistinguishable.
because it looks like CGI to me. I know I would have used CGI.
many thousands dollars cheaper and probably indistinguishable.
seisayyyyy (November 30, 2008 at 5:22 pm)
this is my favourite advert of all time EVER
Pinky2Pooky (November 30, 2008 at 9:15 am)
They weregoing to use special FX instead, but they did the real thing, and I'm glad.
-
Links:
-
Tags:
hip-hop interviews videos r kelly usher eminem jay-z beyonce chris brown artist
coolest commercial ever