Dr Quantum - Double Slit Experiment
BackDr Quantum - Double Slit Experiment
Channel: Science & Technology
Uploaded: September 13, 2006 at 8:22 pm
Author: ReptilianShapeshifte
Length: 00:05:03
Rating: 4.83
Views: 840547
Tags: Dr Quantum What The Bleep Down Rabbit Hole Physics Science Metaphysics
Video Comments:
ArjenDijksman (November 19, 2008 at 2:45 am)
Quote from John Bell, a famous physicist: "De Broglie showed in detail how the motion of a particle, passing through just one of two holes in screen, could be influenced by waves propagating through both holes. And so influenced that the particle does not go where the waves cancel out, but is attracted to where they cooperate." There is nothing weird about particles that show interference patterns.
5thDensity (November 18, 2008 at 10:41 pm)
Dunno, I may be out there a bit but I am wondering if there is a link. There was a time when mixing science and God -or intelligent creator- was a big no no. But now I am seeing there is a direct relationship between the two.
All things have consciousness. Even the plants and trees are aware. Planet earth is a living organism. It is made up of a collection of sentate beings.
Who is to say the smallest of things are not aware. As you quoted, all things are possible.
Nice chatting...
All things have consciousness. Even the plants and trees are aware. Planet earth is a living organism. It is made up of a collection of sentate beings.
Who is to say the smallest of things are not aware. As you quoted, all things are possible.
Nice chatting...
5thDensity (November 18, 2008 at 10:29 pm)
I come from an angel of consciousness because of where I am spiritually. I have shifted through frequency into other dimensions.
Frequency is spirituality, therefore, it is frequencies of consciousness and frequency moves in wave patterns.
That coupled with the idea that each one of us has the godlike creator ability within us to define our own reality. It is through intent that we consciously change our surroundings. We have the thought first then the experience. Never the other way around.
Frequency is spirituality, therefore, it is frequencies of consciousness and frequency moves in wave patterns.
That coupled with the idea that each one of us has the godlike creator ability within us to define our own reality. It is through intent that we consciously change our surroundings. We have the thought first then the experience. Never the other way around.
z11223344 (November 18, 2008 at 7:53 pm)
its not really conciousness,unless ur suggesting the electron is concious. its the same thing used in that guys(forgot his name) cat paradox after a while, if no observer is present, all possiblilities happen at once, its the act of "observation", so i guess intent h as a little to do with it, u have to intend to observe in order to observe. But the camera as i stated below, provides the physical capacity to obseve. the naked eye cannon see an electron.
z11223344 (November 18, 2008 at 7:48 pm)
the difference is that the human eye cant see the atom
the camera can, thus only the camera qualifies as actual observing
i personally bilieve that if marbles were so small we couldnt see them they would produce an interference pattern too
but that might also mean that they should produce said pattern if the guy leaves the room while running the experiment
interesting thought..........
the camera can, thus only the camera qualifies as actual observing
i personally bilieve that if marbles were so small we couldnt see them they would produce an interference pattern too
but that might also mean that they should produce said pattern if the guy leaves the room while running the experiment
interesting thought..........
karichurch1 (November 18, 2008 at 5:46 pm)
this is produced by the cult Ramptha, led by jayzee knight. look it up before you believe everything you see.
5thDensity (November 18, 2008 at 4:00 pm)
Why would it change... isn't observing going on without the camera? I think the bigger idea here is 'intent'.
In other words it only changed when there was intent of being measured/studied behind it verses just plain observing it.
And if that be the case then wouldn't that suggest there is consciousness involved? The what does that say?
In other words it only changed when there was intent of being measured/studied behind it verses just plain observing it.
And if that be the case then wouldn't that suggest there is consciousness involved? The what does that say?
5thDensity (November 18, 2008 at 3:58 pm)
Why would it change... aren't you observing without the camera. I think the bigger idea here is 'intent'.
In other words it only changed when there was intent of being measured/studied behind it verses just plain obsrving it.
And if that be then wouldn't that suggest there is consciousness involved.
In other words it only changed when there was intent of being measured/studied behind it verses just plain obsrving it.
And if that be then wouldn't that suggest there is consciousness involved.
5thDensity (November 18, 2008 at 3:33 pm)
Freaked me out... :D
sixt33n (November 18, 2008 at 1:25 pm)
Filters my good man. Filters.
-
Links:
-
Tags:
hip-hop interviews videos r kelly usher eminem jay-z beyonce chris brown artist
